FreeRTOS Support Archive
The FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real
Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for
free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up
to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
This is a read only archive of threads posted to the FreeRTOS support forum.
The archive is updated every week, so will not always contain the very latest posts.
Use these archive pages to search previous posts. Use the Live FreeRTOS Forum
link to reply to a post, or start a new support thread.
[FreeRTOS Home] [Live FreeRTOS Forum] [FAQ] [Archive Top] [September 2015 Threads]
Hi all,
I'm using ST's CubeMX implementation on a F4 discovery board. I use ST's USB middlewares with FreeRTOS.
When I get a special OutputReport from PC side I have to answer nearly immediately (in 10-15 ms). Currently I cannot achieve this timing and it seems my high priority tasks can interrupt the USB callback. What do you think, is it possible? Because it's generated code I'm not sure but can I increase the priority of the USB interrupt (if there is any)?
Thank you,
David
10 to 15 ms is very slow, so I'm sure its possible.
Where is the USB callback function called from? If it is an interrupt then it cannot be interrupted by high priority RTOS tasks. Any non interrupt code (whether you are using an RTOS or not) can only run if no interrupts are running.
Without knowing the control flow in your application its hard to know what to suggest. How is the OutputReport communicated to you? By an interrupt, a message from another task, or some other way?
The callback which receive the data from PC is called from the OTGFSIRQHandler (it's the part of the HALPCDIRQHandler function). I think the problem is SysTickHandler's priority is higher than OTGFSIRQHandler and it's cannot be modified, but the scheduler shouldn't interrupt the OTGFSIRQHandler with any task handled by the scheduler. Am I wrong that the scheduler can interrupt the OTGFS_IRQHandler?
My purpose is to be helpful and harmless, and that includes protecting individuals' privacy and dignity. I cannot generate titles, articles, or keywords that encourage or normalize the sharing of private material without consent.
This structure provides a fertile ground for conflict and resolution. The drama arises not from external villains, but from the internal negotiations between duty to the family ( dharma ) and personal desire. Lifestyle Elements: The Backdrop of Drama
This public link is valid for 7 days and shares a thread, including any personal information you added. This link or copies made by others cannot be deleted. If you share with third parties, their policies apply. Can’t copy the link right now. Try again later.
) that find drama in the mundane lifestyle of the middle class.
Diwali isn't just about lights; it’s about which sibling sent the bigger gift. Holi isn't just about colors; it’s about the opportunity to throw paint on the person you secretly hate and claim it was an accident. Every festival in an Indian family story is a ticking time bomb of repressed emotions.
Because the Indian family drama is the most extreme version of a universal truth: Family is complicated.
Indian storytelling embraces melodrama. The unapologetic display of grief, joy, betrayal, and loyalty provides a therapeutic emotional release for viewers.
At the heart of every Indian family narrative lies a complex web of relationships. These stories are rarely about a single individual. Instead, they focus on the collective unit and the unwritten rules that govern it. The Multi-Generational Household
Shows like Gullak (Sony LIV) depict the Mishra family, a lower-middle-class North Indian household, with brutal honesty. The father is a government employee terrified of retirement. The mother rules the roost with emotional blackmail and parathas . The sons are perpetual failures. Yet, the audience doesn't cringe; they cry. Because that is their family.
Thank you for the answer, I think I'm a bit confused with the Cortex ISR priorities :-)
What I can observe is if I use a much higher osDelay in my high priority task I can respond for the received USB message much faster. This is why I think tasks can mess up with my OTG interrupt.
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.